2004 • Smart
Fortwo
Smart Fortwo 0.7i Brabus (75 Hp) 2004Overall Score47.25/100
2004 Smart Fortwo vs 2005 Nissan March Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Nissan
March
Nissan March 1.0 i 16V (65 Hp) 2005Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Smart Fortwo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Smart FortwoSpecificationNissan March
SmartMakeNissan
FortwoModelMarch
2004Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
3Doors3/5
Performance
Smart FortwoSpecificationNissan March
12,3 s0–100 km/h15,7 s
150 km/hTop speed154 km/h
698 ccEngine displacement998 cc
75 HPPower65 HP
110 NmTorque89 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Smart FortwoSpecificationNissan March
PetrolFuel typePetrol
33 ltFuel tank46 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Smart FortwoSpecificationNissan March
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
175/50 R16; 205/45 R16Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Smart FortwoSpecificationNissan March
2500 mmLength3715 mm
1515 mmWidth1660 mm
1549 mmHeight1525 mm
805 KgWeight940 Kg
1812 mmWheelbase2430 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Smart Fortwo and 2005 Nissan March approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Smart Fortwo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…