DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Smart Fortwo vs 2005 Daewoo Matiz Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Fortwo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeDaewoo
FortwoModelMatiz
2004Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
2Seats4
3Doors5

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
150 km/hTop speed152 km/h
698 ccEngine displacement995 cc
75 HPPower64 HP
110 NmTorque87 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
33 ltFuel tank38 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
175/50 R16; 205/45 R16Tyre size155/65 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

2500 mmLength3495 mm
1515 mmWidth1495 mm
1549 mmHeight1485 mm
805 KgWeight826 Kg
1812 mmWheelbase2340 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Smart Fortwo and 2005 Daewoo Matiz approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Fortwo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…