DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Smart Fortwo vs 2004 Perodua Kenari Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kenari

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

42.5–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakePerodua
FortwoModelKenari
2007Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
2Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

18,3 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
135 km/hTop speed140 km/h
698 ccEngine displacement989 cc
50 HPPower56 HP
80 NmTorque88 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
33 ltFuel tank40 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
145/65 R15; 175/55 R15Tyre size155/65 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

2500 mmLength3460 mm
1515 mmWidth1475 mm
1549 mmHeight1665 mm
805 KgWeight845 Kg
1812 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Smart Fortwo and 2004 Perodua Kenari approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kenari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…