DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Smart Fortwo vs 2004 Volkswagen Lupo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Lupo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

42.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeVolkswagen
FortwoModelLupo
2005Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
2Seats4
3Doors3

Performance

18,3 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
135 km/hTop speed152 km/h
698 ccEngine displacement999 cc
50 HPPower50 HP
80 NmTorque86 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
33 ltFuel tank34 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
145/65 R15; 175/55 R15Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

2500 mmLength3527 mm
1515 mmWidth1640 mm
1549 mmHeight1460 mm
805 KgWeight884 Kg
1812 mmWheelbase2323 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Smart Fortwo and 2004 Volkswagen Lupo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Lupo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…