DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Smart Fortwo vs 2004 Kia Picanto Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Fortwo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

55.5–54.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeKia
FortwoModelPicanto
2005Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h16,3 s
135 km/hTop speed150 km/h
599 ccEngine displacement999 cc
45 HPPower60 HP
70 NmTorque863 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
33 ltFuel tank35 lt
6 ltUrban consumption5,9 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
145/65 R15; 175/55 R15Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

2500 mmLength3495 mm
1515 mmWidth1595 mm
1549 mmHeight1480 mm
805 KgWeight981 Kg
1812 mmWheelbase2370 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Smart Fortwo and 2004 Kia Picanto approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Fortwo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…