2002 • Smart
Fortwo
Smart Fortwo 0.6i (45 Hp) 2002Overall Score52.5/100
2002 Smart Fortwo vs 1999 Suzuki Alto Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Suzuki
Alto
Suzuki Alto 0.7 i 12V (46 Hp) 1999Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Smart Fortwo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Smart FortwoSpecificationSuzuki Alto
SmartMakeSuzuki
FortwoModelAlto
2002Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
3Doors3/5
Performance
Smart FortwoSpecificationSuzuki Alto
135 km/hTop speed0 km/h
599 ccEngine displacement658 cc
45 HPPower46 HP
70 NmTorque57 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Smart FortwoSpecificationSuzuki Alto
PetrolFuel typePetrol
33 ltFuel tank30 lt
6 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Smart FortwoSpecificationSuzuki Alto
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
145/65 R15; 175/55 R15Tyre size155/65 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Smart FortwoSpecificationSuzuki Alto
2500 mmLength3395 mm
1515 mmWidth1475 mm
1549 mmHeight1450 mm
805 KgWeight683 Kg
1812 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Smart Fortwo and 1999 Suzuki Alto approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Smart Fortwo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…