DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Smart Forfour vs 2004 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeVolvo
ForfourModelS40
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeSedan
4Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
180 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1493 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
95 HPPower100 HP
210 NmTorque150 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3752 mmLength4476 mm
1684 mmWidth1770 mm
1450 mmHeight1454 mm
965 KgWeight1250 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Smart Forfour and 2004 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…