DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Smart Forfour vs 2004 Toyota Passo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Forfour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeToyota
ForfourModelPasso
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1493 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
95 HPPower88 HP
210 NmTorque123 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank40 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3752 mmLength3595 mm
1684 mmWidth1665 mm
1450 mmHeight1535 mm
965 KgWeight930 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2440 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Smart Forfour and 2004 Toyota Passo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Forfour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…