2004 • Smart
Forfour
Smart Forfour 1.5 cdi (95 Hp) 2004Overall Score53.25/100
2004 Smart Forfour vs 2004 Suzuki Swift Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Suzuki
Swift
Suzuki Swift 1.5 i 16V (102 Hp) 2004Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Suzuki Swift
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Smart ForfourSpecificationSuzuki Swift
SmartMakeSuzuki
ForfourModelSwift
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Smart ForfourSpecificationSuzuki Swift
10,5 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
180 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1493 ccEngine displacement1490 cc
95 HPPower102 HP
210 NmTorque133 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Smart ForfourSpecificationSuzuki Swift
DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Smart ForfourSpecificationSuzuki Swift
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Smart ForfourSpecificationSuzuki Swift
3752 mmLength3695 mm
1684 mmWidth1690 mm
1450 mmHeight1500 mm
965 KgWeight1010 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2380 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Smart Forfour and 2004 Suzuki Swift approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Suzuki Swift leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…