2004 • Smart
Forfour
Smart Forfour 1.5 cdi (95 Hp) 2004Overall Score53.25/100
2004 Smart Forfour vs 2004 Nissan Cube Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Nissan
Cube
Nissan Cube 1.4 i (98 Hp) 2004Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Smart Forfour
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Smart ForfourSpecificationNissan Cube
SmartMakeNissan
ForfourModelCube
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeEstate
4Seats—
5Doors—
Performance
Smart ForfourSpecificationNissan Cube
10,5 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1493 ccEngine displacement1386 cc
95 HPPower98 HP
210 NmTorque128 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Smart ForfourSpecificationNissan Cube
DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank0 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Smart ForfourSpecificationNissan Cube
3752 mmLength—
1684 mmWidth—
1450 mmHeight—
965 KgWeight—
2500 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Smart Forfour and 2004 Nissan Cube approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Smart Forfour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…