2004 • Smart
Forfour
Smart Forfour 1.5 cdi (95 Hp) 2004Overall Score53.25/100
2004 Smart Forfour vs 2004 Nissan AD Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Nissan
AD
Nissan AD 1.3i (90 Hp) 2004Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Smart Forfour
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Smart ForfourSpecificationNissan AD
SmartMakeNissan
ForfourModelAD
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeEstate
4Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Smart ForfourSpecificationNissan AD
10,5 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1493 ccEngine displacement1295 cc
95 HPPower90 HP
210 NmTorque120 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Smart ForfourSpecificationNissan AD
DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Smart ForfourSpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/65 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Smart ForfourSpecificationNissan AD
3752 mmLength4370 mm
1684 mmWidth1695 mm
1450 mmHeight1475 mm
965 KgWeight—
2500 mmWheelbase2535 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Smart Forfour and 2004 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Smart Forfour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…