DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Smart Forfour vs 2004 Perodua Kenari Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kenari

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakePerodua
ForfourModelKenari
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
4Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,3 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
158 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1124 ccEngine displacement989 cc
64 HPPower56 HP
92 NmTorque88 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank40 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size155/65 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3752 mmLength3460 mm
1684 mmWidth1475 mm
1450 mmHeight1665 mm
965 KgWeight845 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Smart Forfour and 2004 Perodua Kenari approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kenari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…