2006 • Smart
Crossblade
Smart Crossblade 0.6 i (70 Hp) 2006Overall Score42.5/100
2006 Smart Crossblade vs 2004 Daewoo Matiz Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Daewoo
Matiz
Daewoo Matiz 1.0 i (64 Hp) 2004Overall Score43.25/100
WINNER
Daewoo Matiz
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
42.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationDaewoo Matiz
SmartMakeDaewoo
CrossbladeModelMatiz
2006Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats4
2Doors5
Performance
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationDaewoo Matiz
16,8 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
135 km/hTop speed152 km/h
599 ccEngine displacement995 cc
70 HPPower64 HP
100 NmTorque87 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationDaewoo Matiz
PetrolFuel typePetrol
22 ltFuel tank38 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationDaewoo Matiz
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/40 R16; 215/35 R16Tyre size155/65 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationDaewoo Matiz
2500 mmLength3495 mm
1515 mmWidth1495 mm
1549 mmHeight1485 mm
730 KgWeight826 Kg
1812 mmWheelbase2340 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Smart Crossblade and 2004 Daewoo Matiz approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Matiz leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…