DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Skoda Yeti vs 2017 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeAlfa Romeo
YetiModelMiTo
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats4/5
5Doors3

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
186 km/hTop speed209 km/h
1395 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
125 HPPower140 HP
200 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
7Gears6 TCT
DSGTransmission—
16Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4222 mmLength4063 mm
1793 mmWidth1720 mm
1691 mmHeight1446 mm
1380 kgWeight1170 Kg
322 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2511 mm

Additional Features

Skoda YetiDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelManual Air ConditioningFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraFolding Mirrors

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Skoda Yeti and 2017 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…