2009 • Skoda
Superb
Skoda Superb 3.6 FSI (260 hp) 2009Overall Score82.5/100
2009 Skoda Superb vs 2004 Chrysler Concorde Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Chrysler
Concorde
Chrysler Concorde 3.5 i V6 24V (258 Hp) 2004Overall Score81.75/100
WINNER
Skoda Superb
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda SuperbSpecificationChrysler Concorde
SkodaMakeChrysler
SuperbModelConcorde
2009Model year2004
LiftbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4/5Doors4
Performance
Skoda SuperbSpecificationChrysler Concorde
6,5 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed225 km/h
3597 ccEngine displacement3518 cc
260 HPPower258 HP
350 NmTorque348 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda SuperbSpecificationChrysler Concorde
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
14,3 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
10,0 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda SuperbSpecificationChrysler Concorde
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
205/55 R17Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda SuperbSpecificationChrysler Concorde
4838 mmLength5310 mm
1783 mmWidth1890 mm
1461 mmHeight1435 mm
1665 KgWeight1690 Kg
2761 mmWheelbase2870 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Skoda Superb and 2004 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Superb leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSComments are loading…