2013 • Skoda
Superb
Skoda Superb 2.0 TSI (197 Hp) 2013Overall Score68.5/100
2013 Skoda Superb vs 2013 Opel Cascada Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Opel
Cascada
Opel Cascada 2.0 CDTI (165 Hp) 2013Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Skoda Superb
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda SuperbSpecificationOpel Cascada
SkodaMakeOpel
SuperbModelCascada
2013Model year2013
LiftbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
Skoda SuperbSpecificationOpel Cascada
7,8 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
236 km/hTop speed212 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
197 HPPower165 HP
280 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda SuperbSpecificationOpel Cascada
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank56 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda SuperbSpecificationOpel Cascada
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16; 225/45 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda SuperbSpecificationOpel Cascada
4838 mmLength4696 mm
1817 mmWidth1839 mm
1462 mmHeight1443 mm
1555 KgWeight1701-1816 Kg
2761 mmWheelbase2695 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Skoda Superb and 2013 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Superb leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…