2012 • Skoda
Superb
Skoda Superb 2.0 TDI (170 Hp) 2012Overall Score57.25/100
2012 Skoda Superb vs 2014 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2014 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 2.0 Duratorq TDCi (140 Hp) 2014Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Skoda Superb
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda SuperbSpecificationFord C-Max
SkodaMakeFord
SuperbModelC-Max
2012Model year2014
EstateBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Skoda SuperbSpecificationFord C-Max
—0–100 km/h9,5 s
222 km/hTop speed201 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
170 HPPower140 HP
0 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda SuperbSpecificationFord C-Max
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption6,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Skoda SuperbSpecificationFord C-Max
4838 mmLength4380 mm
1817 mmWidth1828 mm
1510 mmHeight1626 mm
—Weight1488 Kg
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Skoda Superb and 2014 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Superb leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSMitsubishi Outlander vs Skoda Superb2012 and 2012 model years
VSFord C-Max vs Skoda Superb2012 and 2012 model yearsImage unavailableVSIveco Massif 4x4 vs Skoda Superb2011 and 2012 model yearsImage unavailableVSAcura ILX vs Skoda Superb2015 and 2012 model years
VSBuick Encore vs Skoda Superb2015 and 2012 model yearsComments are loading…