DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Skoda Superb vs 2013 Skoda Superb Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Superb

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 2.25 points.

62.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeSkoda
SuperbModelSuperb
2009Model year2013
LiftbackBody typeLiftback
5Seats5
4/5Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
201 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
125 HPPower105 HP
200 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4838 mmLength4833 mm
1783 mmWidth1817 mm
1461 mmHeight1462 mm
1425 KgWeight1512 Kg
2761 mmWheelbase2761 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Skoda Superb and 2013 Skoda Superb approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Superb leads the E-Kıyasla score by 2.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…