DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Skoda Roomster vs 2013 Ford KA Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford KA

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeFord
RoomsterModelKA
2013Model year2013
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h13,1 s
162 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1199 ccEngine displacement1242 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
180 NmTorque145 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank35 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4214 mmLength3620 mm
1684 mmWidth1894 mm
1607 mmHeight1506 mm
1308 KgWeight1055 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2300 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Skoda Roomster and 2013 Ford KA approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford KA leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…