DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Skoda Rapid Spaceback vs 2017 Volkswagen Golf Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Golf

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeVolkswagen
Rapid SpacebackModelGolf
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
205 km/hTop speed222 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1395 cc
125 HPPower150 HP
200 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
55 ltFuel tank40 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption1,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
7Gears—
DSGTransmission—
16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4304 mmLength4270 mm
1706 mmWidth1799 mm
1459 mmHeight1457 mm
1221 kgWeight1599 Kg
384 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2631 mm

Additional Features

Skoda Rapid SpacebackDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelCooled GloveboxDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Skoda Rapid Spaceback and 2017 Volkswagen Golf approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Golf leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…