DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Skoda Rapid Spaceback vs 2017 Ford Tourneo Connect Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Rapid Spaceback

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

60.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeFord
Rapid SpacebackModelTourneo Connect
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,3 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
189 km/hTop speed165 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement999 cc
95 HPPower100 HP
160 NmTorque170 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank0 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
7Gears6
DSGTransmission—
15Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4304 mmLength4418 mm
1706 mmWidth2137 mm
1459 mmHeight1852 mm
1199 kgWeight1420 Kg
384 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2662 mm

Additional Features

Skoda Rapid SpacebackDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Skoda Rapid Spaceback and 2017 Ford Tourneo Connect approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Rapid Spaceback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…