DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Skoda Rapid Spaceback vs 2017 Ford EcoSport Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Rapid Spaceback

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

60.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeFord
Rapid SpacebackModelEcoSport
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
184 km/hTop speed185 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement999 cc
95 HPPower140 HP
160 NmTorque180 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank52 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
15Tyre size205/60 R16 92H; 205/50 R17 93W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4304 mmLength4273 mm
1706 mmWidth1765 mm
1459 mmHeight1648 mm
1199 kgWeight1275 Kg
384 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2519 mm

Additional Features

Skoda Rapid SpacebackDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorUSB Port

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Skoda Rapid Spaceback and 2017 Ford EcoSport approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Rapid Spaceback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…