DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Skoda Rapid vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Rapid

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1.75 points.

58.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeVolvo
RapidModelS40
2015Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,7 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
183 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
90 HPPower115 HP
230 NmTorque270 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank52 lt
4,2 ltUrban consumption4,3 lt
3,4 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
3,6 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4483 mmLength4476 mm
1706 mmWidth1770 mm
1461 mmHeight1454 mm
1159 KgWeight1372 Kg
2602 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Skoda Rapid and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Rapid leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…