DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1986 Skoda Rapid vs 1983 Audi Coupe Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi Coupe

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeAudi
RapidModelCoupe
1986Model year1983
CoupeBody typeCoupe
—Seats5
2Doors2

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h15,9 s
153 km/hTop speed156 km/h
1289 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
54 HPPower75 HP
99 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
37 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R13

Dimensions

4200 mmLength4349 mm
1610 mmWidth1682 mm
1380 mmHeight1350 mm
1240 KgWeight950 Kg
2400 mmWheelbase2542 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1986 Skoda Rapid and 1983 Audi Coupe approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi Coupe leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…