2016 • Skoda
Rapid
Skoda Rapid 1.2 TSI (110 Hp) 2016Overall Score64.5/100
2016 Skoda Rapid vs 2016 Volkswagen Polo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo CrossPolo 1.0 TSI (110 Hp) 2016Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Polo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda RapidSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
SkodaMakeVolkswagen
RapidModelPolo
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Skoda RapidSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
9,8 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
200 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement999 cc
110 HPPower110 HP
175 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda RapidSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption5,3 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda RapidSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/40 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda RapidSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
4483 mmLength3987 mm
1706 mmWidth1698 mm
1461 mmHeight1488 mm
1110 KgWeight1090 Kg
2602 mmWheelbase2469 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Skoda Rapid and 2016 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…