DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Skoda Rapid vs 2016 Skoda Rapid Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Rapid

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.

64.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeSkoda
RapidModelRapid
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
200 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
110 HPPower115 HP
175 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption4,5 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,3 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4483 mmLength4483 mm
1706 mmWidth1706 mm
1461 mmHeight1461 mm
1110 KgWeight1217 Kg
2602 mmWheelbase2602 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Skoda Rapid and 2016 Skoda Rapid approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Rapid leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…