DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Skoda Rapid vs 2016 Ford Fiesta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Rapid

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

64.5–64.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeFord
RapidModelFiesta
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
200 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement999 cc
110 HPPower100 HP
175 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank40 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—TransmissionPowerShift
—Tyre size15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4483 mmLength3969 mm
1706 mmWidth1764 mm
1461 mmHeight1495 mm
1110 KgWeight1122 kg
—Luggage capacity276 lt
2602 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Skoda Rapid

No additional feature records are available.

Ford FiestaDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsUSB Port

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Skoda Rapid and 2016 Ford Fiesta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Rapid leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…