DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Skoda Rapid vs 2016 Citroen C4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeCitroen
RapidModelC4
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
200 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1199 cc
110 HPPower110 HP
175 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 EGS
—Tyre size205/55 R16; 205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4483 mmLength4157 mm
1706 mmWidth1729 mm
1461 mmHeight1490-1530 mm
1110 KgWeight1050 Kg
2602 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Skoda Rapid and 2016 Citroen C4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…