2016 • Skoda
Rapid
Skoda Rapid 1.2 TSI (110 Hp) 2016Overall Score64.5/100
2016 Skoda Rapid vs 2016 Citroen C3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Citroen
C3
Citroen C3 1.2 PureTech (110 Hp) 2016Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Citroen C3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda RapidSpecificationCitroen C3
SkodaMakeCitroen
RapidModelC3
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Skoda RapidSpecificationCitroen C3
9,8 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
200 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1199 cc
110 HPPower110 HP
175 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda RapidSpecificationCitroen C3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda RapidSpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda RapidSpecificationCitroen C3
4483 mmLength3941 mm
1706 mmWidth1728 mm
1461 mmHeight1538 mm
1110 KgWeight1170 Kg
2602 mmWheelbase2466 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Skoda Rapid and 2016 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…