DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Skoda Rapid vs 2017 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Rapid

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeVolkswagen
RapidModelPolo
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
185 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1422 cc
90 HPPower105 HP
230 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
4,2 ltUrban consumption4,2 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
3,9 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
7Gears5
DSGTransmission—
15Tyre size215/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4483 mmLength3987 mm
1706 mmWidth1698 mm
1461 mmHeight1488 mm
1255 kgWeight1139 Kg
530 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2469 mm

Additional Features

Skoda RapidDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsUSB Port

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Skoda Rapid and 2017 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Rapid leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…