DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Skoda Octavia vs 2016 Honda FIT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Octavia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeHonda
OctaviaModelFIT
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1395 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
110 HPPower110 HP
200 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / CNGFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
50 ltFuel tank32 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
6Gears—
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4659 mmLength3955 mm
1814 mmWidth1695 mm
1461 mmHeight1525 mm
1319 KgWeight1080 Kg
2680 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Skoda Octavia and 2016 Honda FIT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Octavia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…