DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Skoda Octavia vs 2016 Seat Alhambra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Alhambra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

72.5–73.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeSeat
OctaviaModelAlhambra
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
202 km/hTop speed198 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement1395 cc
115 HPPower150 HP
200 NmTorque250 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank70 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x2
6Gears6
ManualTransmissionDSG
16Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4659 mmLength4854 mm
1814 mmWidth1904 mm
1460 mmHeight1720 mm
1225 kgWeight1693 kg
568 ltLuggage capacity300 lt

Additional Features

Skoda OctaviaDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth
Seat AlhambraDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistAuto HoldCruise ControlDriver Fatigue DetectionComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerKeyless StartArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelCooled GloveboxDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Skoda Octavia and 2016 Seat Alhambra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Alhambra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…