2017 • Skoda
Kodiaq
Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI (180 Hp) 2017Overall Score72.75/100
2017 Skoda Kodiaq vs 2017 Jaguar F-Pace Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Jaguar
F-Pace
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d (163 Hp) 2017Overall Score72.5/100
WINNER
Skoda Kodiaq
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
72.75–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda KodiaqSpecificationJaguar F-Pace
SkodaMakeJaguar
KodiaqModelF-Pace
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Skoda KodiaqSpecificationJaguar F-Pace
8,0 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
207 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
180 HPPower163 HP
320 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda KodiaqSpecificationJaguar F-Pace
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,4 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda KodiaqSpecificationJaguar F-Pace
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
7 DSGGears6
215/65 R17; 235/55 R18Tyre size235/65 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda KodiaqSpecificationJaguar F-Pace
4706 mmLength4746 mm
1882 mmWidth2070 mm
1655 mmHeight1667 mm
1620 KgWeight1690 Kg
2791 mmWheelbase2874 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Skoda Kodiaq and 2017 Jaguar F-Pace approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Kodiaq leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…