2017 • Skoda
Kodiaq
Skoda Kodiaq 1.4 TSI (150 Hp) 2017Overall Score68.25/100
2017 Skoda Kodiaq vs 2019 Jaguar I-Pace Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2019 • Jaguar
I-Pace
Jaguar I-Pace S 2019 EV400 400 HPOverall Score93.25/100
WINNER
Jaguar I-Pace
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 25 points.
68.25–93.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda KodiaqSpecificationJaguar I-Pace
SkodaMakeJaguar
KodiaqModelI-Pace
2017Model year2019
SUVBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Skoda KodiaqSpecificationJaguar I-Pace
9,8 s0–100 km/h4,8 s
197 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1395 ccEngine displacement90 cc
150 HPPower400 HP
250 NmTorque696 Nm
4Cylinders0
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda KodiaqSpecificationJaguar I-Pace
PetrolFuel typeElectric
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption35,0 kWh/100 km
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption39,0 kWh/100 km
6,8 ltAverage consumption37,0 kWh/100 km
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda KodiaqSpecificationJaguar I-Pace
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears1
—TransmissionAutomatic
215/65 R17Tyre size18
YesABSNo
Dimensions
Skoda KodiaqSpecificationJaguar I-Pace
4697 mmLength4682 mm
1882 mmWidth2011 mm
1655 mmHeight1565 mm
1540/1578 KgWeight2208 kg
—Luggage capacity656 lt
2791 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Skoda Kodiaq and 2019 Jaguar I-Pace approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jaguar I-Pace leads the E-Kıyasla score by 25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…