DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Skoda Karoq vs 2017 Honda FIT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Karoq

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeHonda
KaroqModelFIT
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h—
187 km/hTop speed0 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement1317 cc
116 HPPower100 HP
200 NmTorque119 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank40 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption—
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4382 mmLength3955 mm
1841 mmWidth1695 mm
1603 mmHeight1525 mm
1265 KgWeight1000 Kg
2638 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Skoda Karoq and 2017 Honda FIT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Karoq leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…