2006 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 2.0 (115 Hp) 2006Overall Score60.25/100
2006 Skoda Fabia vs 2006 Suzuki Forenza Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Suzuki
Forenza
Suzuki Forenza 2.0 (127 Hp) 2006Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Skoda Fabia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSuzuki Forenza
SkodaMakeSuzuki
FabiaModelForenza
2006Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSuzuki Forenza
9,9 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement2000 cc
115 HPPower127 HP
170 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSuzuki Forenza
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank0 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSuzuki Forenza
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSuzuki Forenza
3960 mmLength—
1645 mmWidth—
1450 mmHeight—
1110 KgWeight—
2462 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Skoda Fabia and 2006 Suzuki Forenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…