DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Skoda Fabia vs 2003 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Fabia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeVolvo
FabiaModelS40
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
195 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
115 HPPower122 HP
170 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3960 mmLength4516 mm
1645 mmWidth1716 mm
1450 mmHeight1422 mm
1110 KgWeight1230 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Skoda Fabia and 2003 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…