DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Skoda Fabia vs 2010 FAW Bora Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Fabia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Skoda FabiaSpecificationFAW Bora
SkodaMakeFAW
FabiaModelBora
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Skoda FabiaSpecificationFAW Bora
10,8 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
190 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
105 HPPower125 HP
240 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Skoda FabiaSpecificationFAW Bora
DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Skoda FabiaSpecificationFAW Bora
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Skoda FabiaSpecificationFAW Bora
3992 mmLength4376 mm
1642 mmWidth1735 mm
1498 mmHeight1446 mm
1170 KgWeight1310 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Skoda Fabia and 2010 FAW Bora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…