DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 BMW 3 Serisi vs 1999 Audi A6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 5 points.

64.5–69.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationAudi A6
BMWMakeAudi
3 SerisiModelA6
2012Model year1999
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationAudi A6
10,3 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
210 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
143 HPPower180 HP
190 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationAudi A6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationAudi A6
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16 HTyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationAudi A6
4612 mmLength4796 mm
1782 mmWidth1810 mm
1384 mmHeight1453 mm
1595 KgWeight1390 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 BMW 3 Serisi and 1999 Audi A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…