2003 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 1.9 TDI (101 Hp) 2003Overall Score57.25/100
2003 Skoda Fabia vs 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.8 16V GDI (122 Hp) 2003Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Skoda Fabia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda FabiaSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
SkodaMakeMitsubishi
FabiaModelCarisma
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Skoda FabiaSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
11,6 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
187 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
101 HPPower122 HP
240 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda FabiaSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda FabiaSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/60 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda FabiaSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
4222 mmLength4475 mm
1646 mmWidth1710 mm
1452 mmHeight1405 mm
1180 KgWeight1215 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Skoda Fabia and 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…