2012 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 1.6 TDI (75 Hp) 2012Overall Score53.25/100
2012 Skoda Fabia vs 2012 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Volkswagen
Caddy
Volkswagen Caddy 1.6 TDI (75 Hp) 2012Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Skoda Fabia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda FabiaSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
SkodaMakeVolkswagen
FabiaModelCaddy
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
5Doors5
Performance
Skoda FabiaSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
14,1 s0–100 km/h17,6 s
166 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
195 NmTorque225 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda FabiaSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
DieselFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda FabiaSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda FabiaSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
4000 mmLength4406 mm
1642 mmWidth1794 mm
1498 mmHeight1823 mm
1204 KgWeight1402 Kg
2465 mmWheelbase2681 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Skoda Fabia and 2012 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…