2012 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 1.4 TSI (180 Hp) 2012Overall Score68.5/100
2012 Skoda Fabia vs 2003 BMW 3 Serisi Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • BMW
3 Serisi
BMW 3 Serisi 2003Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Skoda Fabia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 7 points.
68.5–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda FabiaSpecificationBMW 3 Serisi
SkodaMakeBMW
FabiaModel3 Serisi
2012Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Skoda FabiaSpecificationBMW 3 Serisi
7,3 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
224 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
180 HPPower116 HP
250 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda FabiaSpecificationBMW 3 Serisi
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption9,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda FabiaSpecificationBMW 3 Serisi
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
7Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda FabiaSpecificationBMW 3 Serisi
4000 mmLength4262 mm
1642 mmWidth1751 mm
1498 mmHeight1408 mm
—Weight1300 Kg
2465 mmWheelbase2725 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Skoda Fabia and 2003 BMW 3 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 7 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…