DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Skoda Fabia vs 2016 Opel Adam Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Fabia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeOpel
FabiaModelAdam
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h13,9 s
182 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1398 cc
90 HPPower87 HP
230 NmTorque130 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank35 lt
4,0 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
3,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
3,4 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionAT
175/70 R14Tyre size17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3992 mmLength3698 mm
1732 mmWidth1720 mm
1467 mmHeight1484 mm
1156 KgWeight1060 kg
—Luggage capacity170 lt
2470 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Skoda Fabia

No additional feature records are available.

Opel AdamDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningDaytime Running LightsAlloy WheelsSunroofUSB Port

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Skoda Fabia and 2016 Opel Adam approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…