DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 BMW 3 Serisi vs 2006 Fiat Croma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Croma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

76.5–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeFiat
3 SerisiModelCroma
2006Model year2006
CoupeBody typeEstate
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
246 km/hTop speed216 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2387 cc
218 HPPower200 HP
250 NmTorque400 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank62 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4580 mmLength4756 mm
1782 mmWidth1775 mm
1395 mmHeight1597 mm
1605 KgWeight1650 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 BMW 3 Serisi and 2006 Fiat Croma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Croma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…