DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 1997 Mazda Bongo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Bongo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.75–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeMazda
156ModelBongo
1997Model year1997
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats—
4Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
203 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2387 ccEngine displacement2494 cc
136 HPPower160 HP
304 NmTorque211 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank65 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears—
205/60R15Tyre size195/70 R15; 215/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4430 mmLength4585 mm
1745 mmWidth1690 mm
1415 mmHeight1960 mm
1350 KgWeight—
2595 mmWheelbase2920 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Alfa Romeo 156 and 1997 Mazda Bongo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Bongo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…