DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Skoda Fabia vs 2017 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

62.25–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeVolkswagen
FabiaModelPolo
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
193 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1422 cc
105 HPPower90 HP
250 NmTorque230 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
3,9 ltUrban consumption4,3 lt
3,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
3,5 ltAverage consumption3,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
185/60 R15Tyre size15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3992 mmLength3972 mm
1732 mmWidth1682 mm
1467 mmHeight1453 mm
1165 KgWeight1151 kg
—Luggage capacity280 lt
2470 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Skoda Fabia

No additional feature records are available.

Volkswagen PoloDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelCooled GloveboxManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Skoda Fabia and 2017 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…