2017 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 1.4 TDI (105 Hp) 2017Overall Score62.25/100
2017 Skoda Fabia vs 2017 Ford KA Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Ford
KA
Ford KA 1.5 16V (105 Hp) 2017Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Skoda Fabia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda FabiaSpecificationFord KA
SkodaMakeFord
FabiaModelKA
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Skoda FabiaSpecificationFord KA
10,1 s0–100 km/h—
193 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
105 HPPower105 HP
250 NmTorque143 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda FabiaSpecificationFord KA
DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank51 lt
3,9 ltUrban consumption—
3,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
3,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda FabiaSpecificationFord KA
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size175/65 R14; 195/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda FabiaSpecificationFord KA
3992 mmLength4254 mm
1732 mmWidth1695 mm
1467 mmHeight1460 mm
1165 KgWeight1048 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2491 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Skoda Fabia and 2017 Ford KA approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSToyota Avanza vs Skoda Fabia2017 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSFord KA vs Skoda Fabia2017 and 2017 model years
VSMitsubishi Xpander vs Skoda Fabia2017 and 2017 model years
VSToyota Yaris vs Skoda Fabia2017 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSPerodua Alza vs Skoda Fabia2017 and 2017 model yearsComments are loading…