DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 BMW 3 Serisi vs 2003 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Freelander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeLand Rover
3 SerisiModelFreelander
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h14,4 s
201 km/hTop speed159 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1950 cc
116 HPPower112 HP
175 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
63 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/80 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4262 mmLength4368 mm
1751 mmWidth1809 mm
1408 mmHeight1708 mm
1300 KgWeight1565 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 BMW 3 Serisi and 2003 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Freelander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…