DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Skoda Fabia vs 2001 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Fabia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeCitroen
FabiaModelXsara
2000Model year2001
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,0 s0–100 km/h16,7 s
162 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1397 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
68 HPPower68 HP
120 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank54 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14; 185/60 R14Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3960 mmLength4167 mm
1645 mmWidth1698 mm
1450 mmHeight1405 mm
1065 KgWeight1120 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Skoda Fabia and 2001 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…