1999 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 1.4 (68 Hp) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
1999 Skoda Fabia vs 2000 Tofas Siena Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Tofas
Siena
Tofas Siena 1.4 i RT (71 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Tofas Siena
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda FabiaSpecificationTofas Siena
SkodaMakeTofas
FabiaModelSiena
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Skoda FabiaSpecificationTofas Siena
15,0 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
162 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1397 ccEngine displacement1372 cc
68 HPPower71 HP
120 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda FabiaSpecificationTofas Siena
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank48 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,9 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda FabiaSpecificationTofas Siena
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14; 185/60 R14Tyre size175/65 R14 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda FabiaSpecificationTofas Siena
3960 mmLength4100 mm
1645 mmWidth1626 mm
1450 mmHeight1445 mm
1065 KgWeight1025 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Skoda Fabia and 2000 Tofas Siena approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Tofas Siena leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…